The start of the economic chain: paychecks become spending, spending fuels prices, and prices move the Fed. Three reports tell the story — Nonfarm Payrolls, the monthly jobs count; JOLTS, the openings-and-quits survey beneath it; and Weekly Claims, the unemployment filings that move first.
August’s +162,000 by sector — the gains sit in the lowest-paying sectors while the two best-paying ones cut · thousands of jobs, seasonally adjusted · BLS
The rate held at 4.1% for the right reason this time — the labor force grew 683,000 and the prime-age core held steady · 13-month trend · BLS via FRED
| Measure | Latest | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Payrolls | +162,000 · August | ▲ the most since March — three-month pace still 71,000 |
| Average hourly earnings | +3.1% y/y · August | ▼ slowest since 2019, outside the pandemic years |
The read · narrated
Friday’s jobs report has two numbers in it. One of them moved the bond market. The other is the one the Fed actually weighs — and it went the other way.
Credit where it’s due. Payrolls rose a hundred sixty-two thousand, the most since March, and the revisions went up: June and July together, fifty-five thousand higher. We said to watch whether August revised July lower. It went the other way — from a loss to a gain.
Three months smooths it out. Seventy-one thousand a month since June, against a hundred forty-two in the spring. The best month in five didn’t change the pace. It interrupted a slower one.
And here’s what squares it with Tuesday. Payrolls are a net — hires minus departures. Tuesday’s report put the hiring rate where it’s been in only eight months since twenty ten, and departures haven’t been lower since twenty thirteen. Almost nobody hired, almost nobody left — and the difference between them can still be a solid number.
Now look at where the jobs were. Restaurants and bars, fifty-nine thousand. Local school districts, forty-two. That’s a hundred and one of the hundred sixty-two, out of the two most seasonally-swung lines in the report.
Then look at what they pay. The sectors that added jobs pay thirty-two fifty an hour. The two that shed them paid fifty-three seventy. Information lost twenty-three thousand — the highest-paying sector on the board.
Which shows up in the paycheck line. Wages rose three point one percent over the year, down from three point two. Outside the pandemic years, the slowest since twenty nineteen.
Here’s why that outranks the count. Jobs don’t cause inflation. Pay does. The Fed watches wages because wages are what turn a busy labor market into rising prices.
The bond market read it the other way. On the print the two-year rose three basis points and the thirty-year fell one — the front end pricing a firmer path.
On this data, we don’t see it. The count is real — hours rose, eight of ten private sectors added. But the sectors hiring are the ones that pay least, the ones that pay most are still cutting, and pay growth slowed again. If that turns, this read turns with it. Until then: watch pay, not payrolls.
What this read is about: the shares of workers being hired and quitting sit near the low end of their range while job postings keep drifting higher · BLS via FRED
| Measure | Latest | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Job openings | 7.27M · July | ▲ up 89K — the one line still drifting higher |
| Hires | 5.05M · July | — flat for nine months on three-month averages |
The read · narrated
Five headline numbers in Tuesday’s jobs report. The agency called every one little changed. Hold onto that phrase — the data underneath has been saying it for nine months.
Month to month, it doesn’t look still. The published levels have hiring down two hundred seventy-eight thousand in July. The average monthly swing this past year: two hundred eleven thousand.
Take three months at a time. Employers hired five point two million people a month over the last three. The same over the three before that. And the three before those. Nine months, one number, within a tenth of a percent.
We got that wrong last month. We called June’s quitting a one-year high, and said nobody was being pushed out. The agency has since revised June’s quits down, and its layoffs up.
One line is moving. Openings, same three windows, oldest first: six point nine million, seven point one, seven point three. Employers advertise more. The people changing jobs, unchanged.
The level is the story. The hiring rate: three point two percent. Since twenty ten it’s been lower in eight months — six in the financial crisis, one when the country shut down, one this February.
Now the half that changes it. In twenty ten, when hiring ran this slow, layoffs averaged one point four percent. Today, one point zero — lower in twelve months since, nearly all in the twenty twenty-one boom. Same hiring speed. Different market.
Quits say it from the worker’s side. One point nine percent — outside the shutdown, not lower since twenty fourteen. People aren’t leaving, and leaving is how most workers get a raise. The wage line is flat.
The bond market barely registered. The ten-year rose four basis points that day — all four inflation compensation. The real yield, the part that answers to labor, didn’t move. Our last read found the mirror: all real, no inflation. Oil and a factory survey landed that minute.
Which fits — nothing asked the Fed for anything. Since the payroll read we’ve said tightening is off the table, easing isn’t on it. Quits at the floor: no wage pressure to fight. Layoffs at the floor: nobody to rescue. Watch the layoff rate, not the openings headline. In a market hiring this slowly, that’s what holds it still.
What this read is about: the filings average fell for the first time in five weeks — and the collecting count kept shrinking underneath it · DOL via FRED
| Measure | Latest | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| New filings, 4-week average | 206,000 · Sep 5 | ▼ first fall after four straight weekly rises |
| Still collecting, 4-week average | 1,779,000 · Aug 29 | ▼ lowest since May — down 30,000 in eight weeks |
The read · narrated
If you lost a job this summer, the number that says how hard it was to get back in isn’t the one in the headlines. And it hasn’t moved since April.
Start with the headline anyway. New filings last week: two hundred six thousand, down a thousand. On its own, that tells you nothing.
So take the four-week average. It fell fifteen hundred — and that matters, because it had risen four weeks running. That climb is the one we flagged last week. It stopped at four.
Why did the average fall more than the week did? Because the week that dropped out of it — August eighth, two hundred twelve thousand — was the highest of the five. But stopping isn’t reversing. The average is still seven thousand above where it started August.
And history says take the stall seriously, not for granted. Since nineteen ninety, that average has climbed four straight weeks and then fallen sixty-two times. Three months on, it was lower in thirty-seven of them. The last five times, it was higher.
Now the gauge that matters more. Not who filed — who’s still collecting. That four-week average is one million seven hundred seventy-nine thousand. Lowest since May, and down thirty thousand across eight weeks.
Then the third gauge, the one that divides out how many workers are covered. The share drawing benefits: one point two percent. Same as last week, and the week before — eighteen straight weeks without moving. That’s the number from the top.
The level check we run every week. The filings average, thirty-three thousand below a year ago. The collecting count, a hundred fifty-three thousand below. The share drawing, one point two against one point three. All three still below.
So what does the Fed read here, five days out? On the labor side, nothing that forces a move either way. Yesterday we showed wholesale costs climbing upstream, and this report doesn’t speak to that. What it says is that the labor market isn’t the half of the mandate making this decision hard.
Watch the collecting count. That’s the one that says whether people are getting back in. We’ll see it again Thursday.
Wages set what businesses charge, and prices follow — the job market feeds Inflation. The Weekly Read puts the whole chain together, one week at a time.
The charts on this page are drawn from the same official series the reads cite — payrolls and the openings survey from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, unemployment-insurance claims from the U.S. Department of Labor, by way of FRED (Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis). Each section holds the most recent read for its report; figures are as of the dates shown and get revised by the agencies.